Biomass potential · Pulp assessment

Scoring the industrial
potential of
plant-based fibres.

Cellulose is behind paper, tissue, textile fibres, bio-based plastics and bioethanol. Reveal-Bio gives any biomass candidate a structured, repeatable first read — before committing to lab trials or investment.

Access the tool → Learn the method
18
Scored criteria
6
Assessment families
0–6
Harmonized scale
Illustrative score — random biomass
Why this exists

A structured read before the lab.

A farmer, a co-op, a research lab, or an industrial player arrives with a candidate biomass and a single question: does this fibre have real industrial potential? The questions that follow — cellulose content? bulk density? real surface area available? — are always the same, but rarely asked in the same order, or measured against the same bar.

Reveal-Bio turns that conversation into a structured, repeatable first read. It will not replace a lab analysis or a feasibility study. It gives you a fast, honest verdict — strong, promising, or not there yet — so you know where to focus your next step.

The method

Six families. One harmonized score.

01
Botanical
Measuring the inner potential of the plant itself. Before any industrial process, the plant's own composition determines what is achievable. Cellulose content sets the ceiling of what can be extracted; mineral and inorganic matter constrains the quality of the end product; dust and fines affect how the material behaves in a pulping line. These are intrinsic properties — they cannot be improved by logistics or process design.
02
Logistics
Assessing how the material travels and arrives. A biomass that looks promising in the field can become costly or unusable by the time it reaches a processing facility. Dryness governs stability and energy cost; bulk density drives transport economics; cleanliness determines whether additional preparation steps are needed. Logistics shapes the real cost before a single chemical is added.
03
Agricultural production
Quantifying what the territory can actually deliver. Industrial pulp production requires scale and continuity. Surface area within a realistic sourcing radius defines the theoretical volume ceiling; yield per hectare translates that area into tonnes; flow continuity determines whether supply can match a plant's operating rhythm year-round or requires costly storage.
04
Technical
Evaluating how readily the biomass can be transformed. Not all fibres behave equally in a pulping line. Processability reflects the material's response to mechanical and chemical treatment; process maturity indicates how well-proven the chosen conversion route is at industrial scale; by-product manageability assesses whether the side streams generated — liquors, residues, hydrolysates — can be handled and potentially valorised.
05
Economic
Estimating the cost structure and its competitiveness. Even a technically excellent biomass must compete with established wood-based supply chains. Opex competitiveness reflects the total operating cost of the conversion process relative to alternatives; capex feasibility assesses the investment required to reach industrial scale; critical capacity reached indicates whether sufficient volume exists to justify that investment and sustain viable unit economics.
06
Environmental impact
Reading the sustainability signal. The long-term credibility of any biomass fibre depends on its environmental profile. The LCA agriculture score captures the upstream footprint of growing and harvesting the biomass; chemical risk reflects the intensity of the conversion chemistry; resource trajectory indicates whether the supply base is expanding, stable, or in structural decline — a proxy for long-term availability and regulatory alignment.

Ready to score your biomass?

Move the sliders to match your measured data. Each family scores independently — the overall verdict updates live.

Open the scoring tool → Contact us